The original developer is gone
You have code and business expectations, but no reliable picture of what works, what is missing or how to release it.
Software project rescue
I turn an unclear codebase, unfinished release or failing delivery into a practical recovery plan and the next production milestone.
Work directly with the senior engineer responsible for delivery.
Recognizable situations
You have code and business expectations, but no reliable picture of what works, what is missing or how to release it.
Bugs, unclear priorities and changing estimates make it hard to decide whether to repair, reduce or replace the current solution.
The team needs a senior engineer to isolate the constraint, reduce the scope and take ownership of a credible next milestone.
The outcome
Rescue begins by separating facts from assumptions. When the codebase is understood, the implementation sprint targets one recovery milestone with explicit acceptance criteria.
How the work runs
I inspect the code, environments, known failures, release path and the business outcome the project was meant to support.
You receive options, risks and a recommended milestone small enough to estimate and verify honestly.
With scope agreed, I fix and release the milestone, document the state and make the next decision easier.
Why Cavendish
I have more than ten years of software engineering experience across agencies, established organizations and a global marketplace. I work directly in existing systems and stay responsible for the path from diagnosis to release.
Commercial scope
Implementation from US$4,000
If the technical state is not yet knowable, we start with Technical Discovery from US$1,500. You keep the assessment whether or not you hire me for implementation.
Questions before we talk
Only when the codebase and failure are already clear. Otherwise a confident fixed quote would hide uncertainty. Technical Discovery creates the evidence needed for an implementation decision.
Only when the evidence supports it. Repairing, reducing scope or replacing one component is often less risky than starting over.
You keep the system assessment, risks, options, proposed acceptance criteria and implementation recommendation. It is useful even if another team performs the work.
Start with the real problem
Share the current systems, the blocked workflow and the result you need. I will reply with questions, a sensible next step or a clear no-fit.